We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Some pluralist systems, for example Scots law in Scotland and types of civil regulation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, usually do not precisely fit into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may possibly have been seriously influenced because of the Anglo-American common legislation tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted from the civil regulation tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling of your first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts right up until or Except possibly new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.
However it really is made distinct that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also be certain regard from the family get rid of in accordance with legislation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated previously mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and also the case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason with the decision of your majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may check here be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage will not be comprehensive, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.